Evaluated Web 2.0 tools
From iProjekt
(→Wikies & blogs) |
|||
(35 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | The team of the iProject EduWeb2.0 has used in academic teaching and evaluated more than 50 Web 2.0 tools. Our evaluation of these Web 2.0 tools | + | The team of the iProject EduWeb2.0 has ''used in academic teaching and evaluated more than 50 Web 2.0 tools''. Our evaluation of these Web 2.0 tools is posted on wiki pages that are listed below (click on the links). The evaluation information includes ''experiences of teachers'', as well as some ''critical problems'' that were noticed while using those tools for education purpose. Also, a comprehensive ''usability survey'' was performed for most useful types of tools (mind mapping, block-diagrams, online notes taking, online presentations) and the ''best performing tools'' in each category are recommended on this web page. |
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
- | - iNetWord | + | - [[iNetWord]] |
- [[Helipad]] | - [[Helipad]] | ||
- | - [[Google Docs]] | + | - [[Google Docs]] (best usability - ''online notes taking'') |
- [[Springnote]] | - [[Springnote]] | ||
- | - Zoho Notebook | + | - [[Zoho Notebook]] |
; | ; | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
- [[Google Docs - presentations]] | - [[Google Docs - presentations]] | ||
- | - [[Google Talk]] | + | - [[Google Talk]] |
- | - [[Google Wave]] | + | - [[Google Wave]] |
; | ; | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
; | ; | ||
- | |||
- | + | == Social bookmarking == | |
- | |||
- | - | + | - [[Delicious]] |
+ | |||
+ | - [[Diigo]] | ||
+ | |||
; | ; | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Line 70: | Line 71: | ||
- | - Bubbl.us | + | - [[Bubbl.us]] |
- | - Mind 42 | + | - [[Mind 42]] |
- | - Mindomo | + | - [[Mindomo]] (best usability - ''mind mapping'') |
- | - Mindmeister | + | - [[Mindmeister]] (very good usability - ''mind mapping'') |
- | - Wise Mapping | + | - [[Wise Mapping]] |
; | ; | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Line 86: | Line 87: | ||
- | - Draw Anywhere | + | - [[Draw Anywhere]] |
- | - Gliffy | + | - [[Gliffy]] (best usability - ''block-diagrams'') |
- | - Lucid Chart | + | - [[Lucid Chart]] |
- | - Project Draw | + | - [[Project Draw]] |
; | ; | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Line 100: | Line 101: | ||
- | - Masher | + | - [[Masher]] |
- | - [[SlideSix]] | + | - [[SlideSix]] (best usability - online presentations) |
- [[SlideStory]] | - [[SlideStory]] | ||
- | - Stupeflix | + | - [[Stupeflix]] |
- [[Veotag]] | - [[Veotag]] | ||
- | - Yodio | + | - [[Yodio]] |
; | ; | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Line 118: | Line 119: | ||
- | - Podomatic | + | - [[Podomatic]] |
- | - Woices | + | - [[Woices]] |
; | ; | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Line 128: | Line 129: | ||
- | - Posteet | + | - [[Posteet]] |
- | - Github | + | - [[Github]] |
- | - Bytemycode | + | - [[Bytemycode]] |
- | - Pastebin | + | - [[Pastebin]] |
; | ; | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Line 142: | Line 143: | ||
- | - Flickr | + | - [[Flickr]] |
+ | |||
+ | - [[Bubblr]] | ||
+ | ; | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | ; | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Online surveys == | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | - [[JotForm]] | ||
- | |||
; | ; | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Line 152: | Line 162: | ||
- | - | + | - [[Riffly]] |
- | - | + | - Covcell [http://www.covcell.org/] |
- | - | + | - [[Voicethread]] |
; | ; | ||
Line 167: | Line 177: | ||
- [[Ning]] | - [[Ning]] | ||
- | - SocialGo | + | - [[SocialGo]] |
---- | ---- | ||
; | ; | ||
Line 174: | Line 184: | ||
- | - Mahara | + | - [[Mahara]] |
- | - Elgg | + | - [[Elgg]] |
- | - Foliospaces | + | - [[Foliospaces]] |
; | ; | ||
---- | ---- | ||
; | ; | ||
- | == Wikies == | + | == Wikies & blogs== |
- [[MediaWiki]] | - [[MediaWiki]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | - [[WordPress]] | ||
; | ; | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Line 215: | Line 227: | ||
; | ; | ||
- | == Screen & | + | == Screen & sound Capture == |
Current revision as of 14:30, 9 February 2011
The team of the iProject EduWeb2.0 has used in academic teaching and evaluated more than 50 Web 2.0 tools. Our evaluation of these Web 2.0 tools is posted on wiki pages that are listed below (click on the links). The evaluation information includes experiences of teachers, as well as some critical problems that were noticed while using those tools for education purpose. Also, a comprehensive usability survey was performed for most useful types of tools (mind mapping, block-diagrams, online notes taking, online presentations) and the best performing tools in each category are recommended on this web page.
Online notes taking
- iNetWord
- Helipad
- Google Docs (best usability - online notes taking)
Mashups
- iGoogle
- myYahoo
Collaborative Google applications
User interface design
- Mockflow
Social bookmarking
- Diigo
Mind-mapping
- Bubbl.us
- Mind 42
- Mindomo (best usability - mind mapping)
- Mindmeister (very good usability - mind mapping)
Block-diagrams
- Gliffy (best usability - block-diagrams)
Online presentations / video podcasting
- Masher
- SlideSix (best usability - online presentations)
- Veotag
- Yodio
Audio podcasting
- Woices
Collaborative programming / SNS
- Posteet
- Github
- Pastebin
Online photos & comic strip creation
- Flickr
- Bubblr
Online surveys
- JotForm
Voice recording & publishing
- Riffly
- Covcell [1]
Social networking
- Ning
- SocialGo
ePortfolio
- Mahara
- Elgg
Wikies & blogs
Video editing
- JayCut
- Tubegrip
- Vixy